Fly.io vs Koyeb

A side-by-side, data-driven comparison of Fly.io and Koyeb — pricing, free tiers and capabilities.

Both run containers on a global edge with usage-based pricing; Koyeb leans serverless with scale-to-zero while Fly gives lower-level control over machines and regions — but note Koyeb's free tier is closed to new signups since its 2026 Mistral acquisition.

At a glance

Specs side by side

 Fly.ioKoyeb
CategoryContainer hostingManaged PaaS
Pricing modelusage-basedusage-based
Free tierNoNo
Managed databaseYesYes
Regions30+global edge
Self-hostableNoNo
Docker-nativeYesYes
Git deployNoYes
Open sourceNoNo

Estimated cost

Estimated monthly cost of a single always-on service — estimates, not quotes. Try the calculator for your own traffic. “—” means no verified price for that tier.

 Fly.ioKoyeb
Small (~0.5 vCPU / 512MB–1GB)$5.7$5.36 (lower)
Medium (~1 vCPU / 2GB)$10.7 (lower)$10.71
Large (~2 vCPU / 4GB)$21.4 (lower)$21.43
Egress ($/GB)$0.02$0.02

Pros & cons

Our editorial assessment — not vendor-stated facts. Last reviewed 2026-07-16.

Fly.io

Pros

  • Runs full Docker containers globally, not just functions, so it fits stateful and long-running apps
  • CLI- and config-driven workflow makes provisioning multi-region deployments straightforward
  • Usage-based billing charged per second, with no required monthly plan commitment
  • Places compute close to users, which suits latency-sensitive applications
  • Includes stateful primitives (volumes, managed Postgres, private networking) that many edge/PaaS platforms lack

Cons

  • Has had publicized reliability incidents in recent years (some community reports attribute past outages to internal service-discovery systems); check Fly's status page and recent incident history before committing
  • Uptime SLA is offered only to Enterprise-plan customers; standard pay-as-you-go usage carries no contractual uptime guarantee
  • Billing can be hard to predict once you scale across instances and regions, and some users report unexpected charges
  • CLI- and config-first, region-centric model has a steeper learning curve than conventional click-to-deploy PaaS

Koyeb

Pros

  • Simple Git-to-deploy and container workflow that abstracts away most infrastructure management
  • Runs workloads on bare-metal-backed microVMs with global geographic distribution
  • Scale-to-zero plus per-second billing, so idle services cost little
  • Expanding GPU and AI-inference capabilities that go beyond a typical PaaS

Cons

  • The Mistral AI acquisition is steering Koyeb toward AI infrastructure (positioned as part of Mistral Compute), creating uncertainty about its long-term commitment to general-purpose web hosting
  • Following the acquisition, the free (Starter) tier is closed to new sign-ups: new accounts must start on a paid plan, and a credit card is required to register
  • Smaller ecosystem, integration catalog, and community than the major clouds or larger PaaS competitors
  • Managed data services center on Postgres, with no broad catalog of managed databases, queues, or caches

Bottom line

Pick Fly.io for latency-sensitive apps that need multi-region by default. Pick Koyeb for serverless-style container apps deployed to the global edge.

Some links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings. Learn more.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fly.io and Koyeb?
Fly.io: Runs full-stack apps and Docker containers as lightweight VMs in many regions, with a focus on low-latency, globally-distributed deployments. Koyeb: A serverless platform to deploy apps and Docker containers globally with autoscaling.
Is Fly.io or Koyeb cheaper?
They're similarly priced for a medium always-on instance (about $10.7/mo vs $10.71/mo). Actual cost depends on your usage.
Does Fly.io have a free tier?
No.
Does Koyeb have a free tier?
No.
Sponsored slot (reserved)

Embed this comparison

Add a neutral, auto-updating Fly.io vs Koyeb card to your site — it links back here.