What is the difference between Heroku and Render?

Heroku: Widely credited with popularizing "git push to deploy". As of 2026 it is in a sustaining-engineering mode with no new features, pushing many teams to evaluate alternatives. Render: A managed cloud for web services, static sites, cron jobs and managed Postgres/Redis, widely recommended as the closest modern Heroku swap.

Is Heroku or Render cheaper?

For a medium always-on instance, Heroku is about $50/mo and Render about $25/mo, so Render is the cheaper estimate. Actual cost depends on your usage — try the calculator.

Does Render have a free tier?

Yes. Free instance spins down after ~15 min idle (not always-on, ~1 min cold start) and is capped at 750 instance-hours/month per workspace — fine for demos, not 24/7 production.

Heroku vs Render

A side-by-side, data-driven comparison of Heroku and Render — pricing, free tiers and capabilities.

Render is effectively the modern Heroku — the same git-push simplicity and managed Postgres, but with a real free tier and lower prices, while Heroku now trades on its mature add-on ecosystem and inertia rather than new features.

At a glance

Render has a free tier — note: Free instance spins down after ~15 min idle (not always-on, ~1 min cold start) and is capped at 750 instance-hours/month per workspace — fine for demos, not 24/7 production; Heroku does not.
At a medium always-on instance, Heroku is ~$50/mo vs Render ~$25/mo — Render is the cheaper estimate.

Specs side by side

	Heroku	Render
Category	Managed PaaS	Managed PaaS
Pricing model	tiered	tiered
Free tier	No	Yes
Managed database	Yes	Yes
Regions	2	4+
Self-hostable	No	No
Docker-native	Yes	Yes
Git deploy	Yes	Yes
Open source	No	No

Estimated cost

Estimated monthly cost of a single always-on service — estimates, not quotes. Try the calculator for your own traffic. “—” means no verified price for that tier.

	Heroku	Render
Small (~0.5 vCPU / 512MB–1GB)	$25	$7 (lower)
Medium (~1 vCPU / 2GB)	$50	$25 (lower)
Large (~2 vCPU / 4GB)	$250	$85 (lower)
Egress ($/GB)	—	$0.15

Pros & cons

Our editorial assessment — not vendor-stated facts. Last reviewed 2026-07-16.

Heroku

Pros

Low operational overhead: deploy with a single git push, no servers to manage
Mature, well-documented workflow with pipelines, review apps, and one-click add-ons
Broad first-class language support through buildpacks
Integrated managed Postgres and key-value store reduce the need to wire up external services
Backed by Salesforce, with a large ecosystem and deep community knowledge base

Cons

No free tier since November 2022; the cheapest Eco dynos also sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity
Costs scale up quickly at higher tiers compared to raw IaaS or cheaper PaaS alternatives
Common Runtime region availability is limited (primarily US and Europe); broader regions require Private Spaces
In February 2026 Salesforce moved Heroku to a sustaining engineering model focused on stability and maintenance rather than new features, and stopped offering Enterprise contracts to new customers, signaling slower innovation (existing credit-card pricing and billing are unaffected)

Render

Pros

Low-ops developer experience — deploy full-stack apps from Git with minimal configuration
Broad coverage in one platform: apps, workers, cron jobs, static sites, durable workflows, and managed databases
Per-service compute plans billed by the second, keeping costs proportional to actual usage per workload
Managed networking, TLS, preview environments, and autoscaling included without extra setup

Cons

No general-purpose HTTP serverless/functions product (no AWS Lambda-style FaaS); that remains a planned feature request with no committed timeline. Render Workflows adds durable, scale-to-zero background execution but is an orchestration product, not a Lambda replacement for request-driven code
Limited regional footprint (Oregon, Ohio, Virginia, Frankfurt, and Singapore) with per-region private networks and no cross-region private networking, global load balancing, or automatic cross-region failover
Managed databases are limited to Postgres and Redis-compatible Key Value, with less low-level infrastructure control than AWS or GCP and no bring-your-own-cloud option
Free-tier web services spin down after 15 minutes of inactivity (cold start on the next request) and free Postgres databases expire 30 days after creation (deleted after a short grace period); total cost can climb as you add more paid services

Bottom line

Pick Heroku for legacy apps and teams that want zero-ops dynos. Pick Render for teams leaving Heroku that want managed DB + services in one place.

Visit Heroku →Visit Render →

Some links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings. Learn more.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Heroku and Render?: Heroku: Widely credited with popularizing "git push to deploy". As of 2026 it is in a sustaining-engineering mode with no new features, pushing many teams to evaluate alternatives. Render: A managed cloud for web services, static sites, cron jobs and managed Postgres/Redis, widely recommended as the closest modern Heroku swap.
Is Heroku or Render cheaper?: For a medium always-on instance, Heroku is about $50/mo and Render about $25/mo, so Render is the cheaper estimate. Actual cost depends on your usage — try the calculator.
Does Heroku have a free tier?: No.
Does Render have a free tier?: Yes. Free instance spins down after ~15 min idle (not always-on, ~1 min cold start) and is capped at 750 instance-hours/month per workspace — fine for demos, not 24/7 production.

Embed this comparison

Add a neutral, auto-updating Heroku vs Render card to your site — it links back here.

More Heroku alternatives · More Render alternatives · Compare all platforms